The writer made a clear illustration of points that were woven to show the article’s focus. He started the article in an interesting way; he first used a research and its results and was able to build up a continuous chain of thoughts after it. The build-up of ideas was gradual. The writer first used researches and would follow them with points that surfaced from the researches done.
One flaw in the way the article was written is the slight use of technical terms (i.e. magnetic resonance imager) that may confuse readers. While some technical terms were explained briefly, most terms were left to be understood by the readers.
Taking note of the flaws of the article and the interesting ways the article was written, I can inject my own creativity to make an essay of the same topic. I can start the essay with sentences that can tickle the interest of readers. The body of the essay can be written using more vivid words and descriptions so the readers can actually picture the main points I convey. I can use technical terms but will include brief explanations about them.
I can also use a gradual flow of ideas, similar to the technique the essay employed, but maybe I can use examples from everyday life to give the article a more personal view rather than remain purely grounded on facts and research results.
0 comments:
Post a Comment